The composition reported here is the average of analyses of two samples: UA343 and UA743.
Late Pliocene Dawson Cut forest bed and new tephrochronological findings in the Gold Hill Loess, east-central Alaska
|StationID||Latitude||Longitude||Geologist||DateVisited||Age Info||Volcano||Eruption||Location Description||Text Description||Sample ID||Sample Type 1||Sample Type 2||Final Unit||Material||Coeff||SiO2||TiO2||Al2O3||FeOT||MnO||MgO||CaO||Na2O||K2O||P2O5||Total-majors||REF majors||METH majors||Fe2O3/Fe203T orig||FeO/FeOT orig||Volatiles csv||METH volatiles||Cs||Rb||Ba||Sr||La||Ce||Pr||Nd||Sm||Eu||Gd||Tb||Dy||Ho||Er||Tm||Yb||Lu||Y||Zr||Nb||Hf||Ta||Pb||Th||U||Sc||V||Cr||Fe||Co||Ni||Cu||Zn||Ga||Mo||As||Na||K||Ref trace1||METH trace1||Rb||Ba||Sr||La||Ce||Nd||Sm||Eu||Gd||Dy||Er||Yb||Lu||Y||Zr||Nb||Pb||Th||U||Sc||Ti||V||Cr||Ni||Cu||Zn||Ga||Ref trace2||METH trace2||Light csv||Halogen csv||other major csv||other lile csv||other ree csv||other hfse csv||other hpe csv||other tm csv||other misc csv|
|Pewe_2009_Gold_Hill_Loess_Tephra_averages||64.8||-147.69997||Pewe, T. L.||Late Cenozoic tephrochronological record of the Fairbanks area, Alaska. Tephra in the Gold Hill Loess and in sediments younger than the Gold Hill Loess. Glass geochemical data averages here are calculated from analyses of multiple tephra correlated across different stratigraphic locations in the Fairbanks area. Individual sample IDs are noted in the sample descriptions. Note that tephra units only located in one stratigraphic section are not included here and are listed by individual sample ID (see Pewe et al., footnotes of tables 1, 2, and 3).||The composition reported here is the average of analyses of two samples: UA343 and UA743.||Pewe_2009_Gold_Hill_Loess_Ester_Ash_Bed_average||Tephra Fall||Cumulate||Glass||70.92||0.45||14.47||3.81||0.16||0.42||1.75||5.06||2.74||4792||EMP||3.81||Cl=0.21; H2O=3.11||EMP|
This website is supported by the U.S. Geological Survey under Cooperative Agreement Grant G22AC00137
Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.