AVO Logo
Site Map | FAQ |
Alaska Volcano Observatory
 
You are here: Home > Samples > Mackay_2016_White_River_north_average

SAMPLE INFO : Mackay_2016_White_River_north_average
Sample ID:Mackay_2016_White_River_north_average
Station ID:Mackay_2016_White_River_north_average
Datum:NAD83
Sample Type 1:Tephra Fall
References:
A mid to late Holocene cryptotephra framework from eastern North America

GEOCHEM DATA
StationIDLatitudeLongitudeGeologistDateVisitedAge InfoVolcanoEruptionLocation DescriptionText DescriptionSample IDSample Type 1Sample Type 2Final UnitMaterialCoeffSiO2TiO2Al2O3FeOTMnOMgOCaONa2OK2OP2O5Total-majorsREF majorsMETH majorsFe2O3/Fe203T origFeO/FeOT origVolatiles csvMETH volatilesCsRbBaSrLaCePrNdSmEuGdTbDyHoErTmYbLuYZrNbHfTaPbThUScVCrFeCoNiCuZnGaMoAsNaKRef trace1METH trace1RbBaSrLaCeNdSmEuGdDyErYbLuYZrNbPbThUScTiVCrNiCuZnGaRef trace2METH trace2Light csvHalogen csvother major csvother lile csvother ree csvother hfse csvother hpe csvother tm csvother misc csv
Mackay_2016_White_River_north_averageUnknown, Unknown 1880 known unit; 1470; Age is approximate. Mean age of 11 radiocarbon samples from beneath the northern lobe of the White River Ash, ranging from 1750-2005 yBP (from Lerbekmo and others 1975).50--This sample is likely an average composition calculated from analyses of multiple White River Ash east samples from different locations. Mackay and others (2016) cite the data for this White River Ash north average composition as coming from Jensen (2007). Mackay_2016_White_River_north_averageTephra FallCumulateGlass 73.96 0.21 14.41 1.61 0.06 0.33 1.77 4.1 3.23 11131EMP1.61Cl=0.32; H2O=2.69EMP

Contact AVO Privacy Accessibility Information Quality FOIA
URL: www.avo.alaska.edu/samples/sample_info.php
Page modified: August 1, 2017 15:29
Contact Information: AVO Web Team

twitter @alaska_avo
facebook alaska.avo
email Receive volcano updates by email: USGS VNS

This website is supported by the U.S. Geological Survey under Cooperative Agreement Grant G22AC00137

Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.